Movie Review: Palindromes 2004 (update Nov 30, 2006)
Thursday, November 30th, 2006I have been meditating on the concept of newness lately.One has to be alert when trudging through the dense forest of supermarket aisles that is capitalism. An old package that is re-packaged as a new idea is not what I would consider new. True: Musicians and Artists have relied on the continuum of rereading and retelling age old stories from the pre-press era, and in doing so, a new angle may have been inadvertently added to the storyline. That is the magic of the oral tradition, or gossip.
Tom Tykwer’s movie Lola Rennt (Run Lola Run 1998) is a new insight into Krzystof Kiesklowski’s Przypadek (Blind Chance 1981), where characters are “given” second and third chances in Buddhist-like reincarnations to repeat the plot and get it correct. Mission Impossible 3, on the other hand, cannot be said to provide anything new from Mission Impossible 1. Most of what is proclaimed to be “new” from Hollywood today usually has a higher corresponding quotient of suckage than its predecessors, especially when sequel numbers are involved.
Ok,ok: the decibels are also louder than the past one.
Todd Solondz’s Palindromes, for me, is new. From the director who bought you Welcome to the DollHouse(1995), Solondz retools the Luis Bunuel device of cycling between multiple actresses to play one character. While Bunuel alternates between the gorgeously patrician Carole Bouquet and the meek Angela Molina in Cet obscur objet du désir (The Obscure Object of Desire 1977) to show the duality of sexual politics, Solondz uses this technique to expound partly on the notion of the omniscient, god-like director. Going by the references to ab*rt*on, I’m going to make a far-reaching guess and say that it’s a nod in the direction of Martin Amis’s novel Dead Babies, where one character ruminated on some greater force (the author) who seems to be controlling his destiny.
In Palindromes, everyone from a skinny bony white girl to a fat obese black woman, Jennifer Jason Leigh, chubby white girl, and small black girl, gets their rotation at playing Aviva. In one hilarious moment, Sharon Wilkins (who plays the fat black Aviva) looks around in existential desperation for a reason why she is once again, back in the role of Aviva. I have read some puzzled comments online, trashing the move of multiple actors as a route to incoherence. However, it should be exceeding clear the reasons behind Solondz decisions when the accused Mark Weiner explains:
You might lose some weight, your face may clear up, get a body tan, breast enlargement, a sex change, it makes no difference. Essentially, from in front, from behind. Whether you’re 13 or 50, you will always be the same….There’s no freewill. I mean, I have no choice but to chose what I choose, to do as I do, to live as I live. Ultimately, we’re all just robots programmed arbitrarily by nature’s genetic code….We hope or despair because of the way we’ve been programmed. Genes and randomness, that’s all there is….
In modern times, when we blindly follow actors blindly traversing through 90 minutes of repackaged scripts that follow certain laws of Hollywood film-making (beauty is a function of those who get to make it to the end, children before women, women before men, reverse order for deaths, or my favorite: women are only allowed to be killed by other women, etc), it’s good to know that there’s someone out there doing his best to cut the puppet strings and break us from our infinite Seagalian reiterations.

