Archive for April, 2009

Are You A Stepford Wife Quiz (update: April 29, 2009)

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

Look Guys! My First Online Quiz! Created by yours truly to celebrate a book I finally got my grubby hands on:

click on image above to take my Quizilla Test: Are You A Stepford Wife?

+++++++++++++++++

I was prompted to create my own quiz after I scoured the internet taking all the other wife tests. Below are the results of all the ones I took:

What Kind of Wife Are You? Quiz

Result:

You are a(n) Stepford Wife. If you look up perfection in the dictionary you are bound to see a picture of yourself there! You are absolutely flawless and make all the other wives look like trash. You are a super woman and get everything done without even a hair getting out of place. You are always in control and keeping appearances are the most important thing. You cook and clean and lavish your man with so much attention that the other husbands are jealous.

Are you a good wife? Quiz
Result:
“You are the perfect wife! You’d certainly keep your husband on his toes, but you’re not loaded with the kind of energy that’d make him regret marrying you. You should have a very happy marriage while with your man, whoever he is. I love you, cherry of my pie!”

Which Desperate wife are you? Quiz
Result:
“Bree: You are the best of the best . You are the only human being that is even close to being defined as perfect. Your conservative and a hard ass . You are my favorite.”

Which wife of Henry the Eighth are you? Quiz
Result:
“Katherine of Aragon: You are Katherine of Aragon, first wife of Henry. You are devout and scholoraly. You hide your emotions well, which is a good and bad thing. You have strong beliefs and stick to them. You would sooner die peniless and lonely than loose your dignity. ”

Which Army Wife Are you? Quiz
Result:
“You are Claudia Joy. You are very involved in the military community and you love helping others. It’s hard for you to let others help you out. You have your head on straight and are very intelligent. You will do anything for your husband’s career.”

How Good A Wife Are You? Quiz
Result:
You are :100% Good Wife

Would You Have Been a Good Wife in the 1930s? Quiz
Result:
“You Would Make a Great 1930’s Wife: You’ve got a few retro ways, and you would make the ideal 1930’s wife. At least, that’s how it looks on paper. You may just be an easygoing, pleasant person.
With a personality like yours, you’d be a great wife in any era! ”

Sometimes you need 31 years of friendship to get a picture like this (update: 4-28-2009)

Monday, April 27th, 2009

Me and my childhood friend Dave, who have been through 7 bands together, countless relationships with other people, and approximately 1,850,284,011.5 proof of various fermented produce from around the globe.

The Angie Harmon Keepin’ It Real Prize goes to…. (update: April 25, 2009)

Saturday, April 25th, 2009

Perez Hilton's just jelis, admit it!

If the first thing you think about when you look at this is “I wonder what her views on gay marriage is,” it would be like gay men looking at Marc Anthony and asking, “yeah but does he know The Da Vinci Code is a rewrite of Eco’s Foucault’s Pendulum which in effect is a Da Vinci metatextual code in itself, given Leonardo’s penchant for hidden self-portraits in both the Mona Lisa and the Shroud of Turin?”

The Election 2008 resulted in one thing: a letter to the democratic party requesting my name be quickly removed from their registered list. After seeing how badly behaved and vicious “liberals” and democrats were, I vowed never to be associated with that group again. Seal-batterers, nun-molesters, people who demand sterling service at fast food counters, and even I.T. support people, I will reconsider as a species I belong to (under threats of repeated exposure to Kevin Costner in Waterworld), but fierce liberals are as welcomed by me as vegans at an Anthony Bourdain chowdown.

Though I did not vote for Mac and Maverick, I do have the nifty Elisabeth Hasselbeck McCain t-shirt that I occasionally wear around town to steel my nerves in the matter of extreme crossdressing. It also sharpens my reflexes against NPCA (National Pie-Carrying Association) democrats.

For years, I have turned down invites to dinners and events thrown by “liberal” democratic friends. You know, the ones who will consider pouring hydrochloric acid in your after-dinner port if you accidentally mispronounced herstory “history.” But the Election of 2008 was the straw that broke the donkey’s back. Online and around town, Obama supporters (and many Californians) showed just how intolerant and narrow-minded they were when they touted their brand of diversity.

The latest example of this intolerance arrives at the Miss USA paegant. Some internet star of no consequence (it takes one to know one) apparently asked Miss California, San Diego’s Carrie PreJean what she thought about gay marriage. It has been speculated that her answer cost her the first place prize. Here it is, word-for-word:

“Well, I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. And you know what, in my country, in my family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that’s how I was raised and that’s how I think it should be between a man and a woman. Thank you very much.”

My gut response to Prejean’s answer, as an openly gay member of the GLBT community who wants to legalize and participate in gay marriage is: Great answer. This girl should have won. At least she’s not sacrificing her honest opinion and who she is just to win some silly prize. I will always admire anyone who doesn’t get bullied into going against their beliefs.

The judge, an openly gay man- who posed the question, proceeds to go online and string up a panty twist of hissy fits for the entire week, giving the world an infinitely rich supply of ammunition to not accept gay marriage and gay people. Certainly one part should never represent a whole, but his response to Prejean’s modest and honest answer probably set the gay community back more than her answer did.

To all the caustic graceless pro-gay liberals out there, if Prejean had been a yes-man and told judges what they wanted to hear just to win, it would be akin to hiding who she was just to get the job. And we know, from the history of closeted, gay Hollywood movie stars, that’s one mistake that should never be repeated.

In the Kingdom of the Blind (update: April 16, 2009)

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

paul potts susan boyle britains got talent
Paul Potts and Susan Boyle (click on pic for youtube video)

I absolutely love the string of talents coming out of UK’s Britain’s Got Talent (from which US borrowed and turned into American Idol). First Paul Potts, now Scot singer Susan Boyle.

It’s not that I would listen to anything from Les Miserables, but what stood out for me was the moment she got onstage. The horrendous looks from the “beautiful” people in the audience, though no great surprise, shocked me more than anything that could come out of Boyle’s lips.

How did we, as an enlightened society, get to the stage where we presume that certain appearances guaranteed quality, and others did not? It could be argued that all this can be traced back to the days when primates selected their partners based on healthy physique and complexion, instinctively knowing they will improve their chances in the next generation. Darwinists could go on about the survival of the fittest, and phrenologists can sell you the Brooklyn Bridge. Maybe Denzel Washington got his honorary Ph’d because scientists claim he has the most symmetrical face. I think Mt. Fuji may be next in line for a doctorate.

I think it’s really Cultural Darwinism at work. Jared Diamond, in Guns, Germs, and Steel posited that technology played a heavy role in the West’s eventual dominance over Eurasian continents. Technology today, in the form of media, continues its relentless march towards molding our expectations, and shaping the way we think.

Through movies, tv, internet, and CGI films, it’s the “beautiful” people who make it to the end of the story. It’s the “beautiful” people who can do more, fight better, think quicker, sing better. What BGT judge Amanda Holden forgivingly calls “cynicism” (on behalf of the audience) is really nothing but downright brutality in the social caste system of our supposed Rousseauian mindset. Even Christian Amanpour uttered the phrase “lowered expectations” when reporting Boyle’s story on CNN. Had a gorgeous girl stepped onstage, there would have been no pre-performance frowns, no surprises, no ecstasy, no twitter showboating from Hollywood stars.

Why do we trust appearances so much that we assume people can’t deliver before we even see the results? I think it’s better to assume people can, and detract only when you need to.

99 44/100% pure (update: April 15, 2009)

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

Marilyn Chambers in The Mitchell Brothers’ Behind The Green Door is a perfect example of how forbidden things grow greater when left pristine in one’s imagination.

As a child, I heard people talking about it. I even saw posters of it when walking past 42nd street clutching to my parents’ arms. In my mind, I conjured unspeakable acts flashing across the screen…(at that age, unspeakable acts probably consisted of having a morning bowl of Kellogs Yellow Corn Pops with skim milk). Years later, that which was forbidden continued to grow in my imagination. After all, eroticism, of all things, elevate in the unseen: when one’s body is hidden behind layers of clothing, the mind’s eye runs amok. Nudity is the death of mystique.

Of course, when I finally saw Behind the Green Door at age 20. I summarily yawned, pressed the fast forward on the BetaMax to speed to the end so I could go back to playing with my stuff animals.

For me, I think the greatest moment for Westport CT’s own Chambers, who passed away on April 13, 2009 was her appearance on the Ivory Snow soap box when the 60s turned into the 70s. The moment Proctor and Gamble, whose product slogan is 99 44/100% pure found out about her other talents, they pulled the product from the shelves. The timing was so propitious, even Warhol and his factory was stripped of all irony.



Time, as well as life, is a series of labyrinthine paths. History could have taken the less travel route; and if it did, maybe none of us would be here today. I compare Chambers’s soap box to the magazine ads for Ivory Snow when the 40s turned into the 50s:



If Chambers continued with Ivory Snow and turned down the Mitchell Brothers, maybe I’ll be driving a minivan today, loading a plasma screen TV into the back next to the 2 kids and 1.5 dog. You know what they say about storms: A Yale graduate rolls a fatty in Kennebunkport, and somewhere in Bombay, a butterfly pours a Kalyani Black Label on the street for its homies.

10 Bond Girls (update: 4-9-2009)

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

I have stopped paying attention to Bond movies long ago, though when they play the reruns on tv these days, I still sneak a peak. My list of favorite Bond girls is quirky at best. I pay more attention to the peripheral people than the person I am suppose to be looking at. Of course, folks always automatically assume I would pick Caroline Cossey (nee Tula), the transsexual walking poolside for .005 seconds in For Your Eyes Only. No. You have to do more than that to make it on my list.

1.Tania Mallet (Goldfinger 1964: Tilly Masterson)
The prim, solemn, well-dressed sister of the girl who got gold-leafed at the beginning of Goldfinger, bent on vengeance, she was the one that got away, taken down by Job’s flying hat before Bond could help himself. My favorite Bond girl.


2. Alison Doody (A View To A Kill 1985: Jenny Flex)

The perpetual equestrienne, whether it be showing Bond his bedroom, going to a car-wash, or simply wielding a gun, Jenny turns out fabulously in the nattiest horse-riding outfit to grace the screen.

3. Carole Bouquet (For You Eyes Only 1981: Melina Havelock)


The prettiest Bond girl ever, in my opinion. Carole Bouquet rarely bore a sexy outfit in this Bond flick. I think any gratuitous view of her was blocked by a gigantic crossbow. But I adore Carole Bouquet. Her handsome allure is dazzling in Bunuel’s That Obscure Object of Desire.

4. Mie Hama (You Only Live Twice 1967: Kissy Suzuki)

Mie Hama’s 3rd Japanese girl up the stairs is the most magical Bond moment. For the uninitiated, Bond has to go undercover in a Japanese island as a 6′4″ Asian and he has to pick a Japanese wife to help his undercover operation. His people pick 3 local girls for him to chose from. The first two are stinkers that could make paper bags howl. As the third one approaches, Bond grimaces, bracing himself for the worst. And of course, Mie looks up in a combination of modesty and stateliness. If there is one look that sums up the ideal wife according to Pristine, it is this.

5. Barbara Bach (The Spy Who Loved Me 1977: Major Anya Amasova)

My first Bond love in my first Bond movie as a youth. Barbara’s beauty is like a kaleidoscope: from one angle she looks French, from another, Hispanic, then suddenly Teutonic. And where did this wonder come from? Queens, NYC. The Spy Who Loved Me had it all. The coolest cars, the most exotic locations, the discotheque version of the Bond theme, Jaws, and the hottest villain.

6. Caroline Munro (The Spy Who Loved Me 1977: Naomi)

Caroline Munro as the tough sexy sadistic evil villainess in The Spy Who Loved Me had too short an appearance before she was offed. Who in the world would wake up in the morning to go kill secret agents and decide to put on the reddest lipstick, the thickest eyebrows, and the skimpiest outfit?

7. Daniela Bianchi (From Russia With Love 1963: Tatiana Romanova)

Tatiana marries Bond and the two play a cute stretch as husband and wife. Well, until Bond manhandles his wife and gives her a walloping in the train cabin. To which she can only counter with, “all I know is I love you!” Classic old school romance. Can’t beat it. And of course, how can anyone not love that black choker?

8. Izabella Scorupco (Goldeneye: Natalya Fyodorovna Simonova)

Mousy science nerd narrowly escapes the monstrous Famke Janssen, who gets a little bit too excited when blowing away a roomful of innocent scientists with her machine gun. If my memory serves me correctly, Fyodorovna spends most of Goldeneye in a fuzzy cardigan sweater, clinging to Bond for protection from the meanies. I identify.

9. Michelle Yeoh (Tomorrow Never Dies 1997: Wai Lin)

Ok, I haven’t seen this one. But Michelle was born literally next town over from where I was born. She’s my peeps.

10. Lois Maxwell (Miss Moneypenny)

Well who wouldn’t want to be an executive administrative assistant perpetually in a manwich, with your male boss behind you and the icon of manhood, James Bond in front of you? Answering to two men while typing dictation and imparting witty repartee. Is a girl’s work ever done?

People who have no price tags are priceless (update: 04-08-2009)

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

I have never been a fan of platitudes, but some tire me quicker than others. What Goes Around Comes Around is particularly offensive. Maybe it’s because I was kinda grossed out by “hair metal bands” of the 80s. And when I think about that trite cliché, one can’t help shuddering at the thought of the band RATT, whose rise to fame rode on the back of the couplet Round and round, what goes around comes around.

The phrase “What Goes Around Comes Around” is really nothing but a thinly-veiled version of the vindictive sentiment, “An eye for an eye. A tooth for a tooth.” Nobody knows whether Christians or Jews practiced an eye for an eye more, but it is quite certain that hormonally-charged math geeks, staying up all night trying to develop a swimsuit calendar for game theory came up with “an eye for an eye’s” spectacle-wearing cousin: Tit for tat.

Then of course, Buddhists, historically deprived of cheeseburgers consoled their craving hunger by developing the concept of karma, enabling Hollywood celebs to remain civil to their #1 PR agent: paparazzi (note curious abbreviation) purely out of fear of retribution or coming back in the next life as a White Castle slider.

Businessmen (who usually make strange bed partners, even though nobody ever questions why or how they agreed to get into bed in the first place) filibustered a contract signing by stretching the phrase to I rub your back, you rub mine.

But look closely at the logic of “what goes around comes around” and you will quickly realize that the law of conservation pertaining to jerks getting their due can be inverted: if you don’t do unto others what you don’t want done to you, it would follow that you also wouldn’t help them unless you expect to be helped as remittance.

That means charity now has a price, and people are keeping tabs.

It would also mean that the inertia of kindness may be infinitely stalled if the initiating party feels they have nothing to gain from it.

Faith Hill said it best when she sings “Tell me, what’s in it for me?” Possibly the biggest turnoff attitude to guys, if you listen to them privately.